<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fat heroines for fat women and  3  categories of books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christinecoleman.net/fat-heroines-fat-women-3-categories-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christinecoleman.net/fat-heroines-fat-women-3-categories-books/</link>
	<description>Writing Matters</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 12:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.christinecoleman.net/fat-heroines-fat-women-3-categories-books/comment-page-1/#comment-1314</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christinecoleman.net/?p=803#comment-1314</guid>
		<description>Thank  you for this thoughtful comment - I'm in full agreement with you  that  there are many more than 3 categories, but I think these are quite useful as a starting point  for further classification. If I did set off down that road I'd be  going round in circles, and branching off all over the place.  Why have I suddenly had an image of the Mandlebrott Set in my head? I'm no good at maths  - my school  put us firmly into one of two boxes, ('Science' or' Art') but in recent years I've been reading up on some of the things I'd missed out on entirely. I still not much good at maths, but I now have some understanding of how and why  it works at higher levels- and I get very excited when I come across beautiful theories.
Physical Beauty and ideas thereof- Mmm I can't claim to have explored this at any great depth, but it might give readers some light food for thought!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank  you for this thoughtful comment - I&#8217;m in full agreement with you  that  there are many more than 3 categories, but I think these are quite useful as a starting point  for further classification. If I did set off down that road I&#8217;d be  going round in circles, and branching off all over the place.  Why have I suddenly had an image of the Mandlebrott Set in my head? I&#8217;m no good at maths  - my school  put us firmly into one of two boxes, (&#8217;Science&#8217; or&#8217; Art&#8217;) but in recent years I&#8217;ve been reading up on some of the things I&#8217;d missed out on entirely. I still not much good at maths, but I now have some understanding of how and why  it works at higher levels- and I get very excited when I come across beautiful theories.<br />
Physical Beauty and ideas thereof- Mmm I can&#8217;t claim to have explored this at any great depth, but it might give readers some light food for thought!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: litlove</title>
		<link>http://www.christinecoleman.net/fat-heroines-fat-women-3-categories-books/comment-page-1/#comment-1313</link>
		<dc:creator>litlove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christinecoleman.net/?p=803#comment-1313</guid>
		<description>R. J. Ellory is one of those writers I keep meaning to read and then forget about. I like the division into three, as the tendency is often to split book categories into just two - mass market and literary - whereas there are probably more categories than three if you think about it! I don't read much chick lit because I think it's very tied to stages of life. I don't want to read about young single women trying to find a husband because I'm not there myself, but I'm always interested in more profound books that start to question why beauty is seen as so important and why women's self-esteem oscillates so wildly according to genre and fashion. I read one Mavis Cheek whose title I now can't recall, and enjoyed it quite a lot. Good luck with exploring the prominence of beauty in your own novel - it's something we seriously need to think about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R. J. Ellory is one of those writers I keep meaning to read and then forget about. I like the division into three, as the tendency is often to split book categories into just two - mass market and literary - whereas there are probably more categories than three if you think about it! I don&#8217;t read much chick lit because I think it&#8217;s very tied to stages of life. I don&#8217;t want to read about young single women trying to find a husband because I&#8217;m not there myself, but I&#8217;m always interested in more profound books that start to question why beauty is seen as so important and why women&#8217;s self-esteem oscillates so wildly according to genre and fashion. I read one Mavis Cheek whose title I now can&#8217;t recall, and enjoyed it quite a lot. Good luck with exploring the prominence of beauty in your own novel - it&#8217;s something we seriously need to think about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

